Thursday 9 May 2019

A MERE TOKEN GESTURES TO "PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT" AND "SAVE WILDLIFE"

I'd really like to know by how much as these "No free single-use plastic bag" and "no plastic straws" rulings have actually achieved to protect the environment and save wildlife in Malaysia, when almost everything else we buy comes packed or wrapped in plastic, to the extent that my dedicated garbage bin for plastic to be recycled ("hopefully" ) fills up faster than my bin for other refuse.




This "no free single-use plastic bags" ruling began with no free single-use plastic bags on Saturdays in Penang shortly after the Pakatan Harapan won the state government in 2008 and it was introduced by the Pakatan run Selangor state government in 2010 and in 2017, the ruling was extended to include all days of the week.


The Federal Territories Ministry, under the Pakatan Harapan government since 10th May 2018, also mandated "no free, single-use plastic bags" within Malaysia's federal territories such as Kuala Lumpur and Labuan from March 2019.


The other day, I went for a root beer in one of those chain outlets which had a sign saying that they had stopped giving out plastic straws but they had put a plastic spoon in the glass of root beer, which made this campaign a big joke.


In many ways, I feel that these rulings are mere token gestures to look "good" and "environmentally responsible" whilst they are a proverbial drop in the bucket in terms of reducing plastic waste, when almost everything else we buy comes packed or wrapped in plastic and container loads of plastic waste are being illegally imported into Malaysia, with non-recyclable plastics being falsely declared as "recyclable".


"Checks show dirty plastic still being smuggled into Malaysian ports"

https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2019/04/482312/checks-show-dirty-plastic-still-being-smuggled-malaysian-ports


Also, most plastics cannot be recycled.


According to environmental advocacy group Greenpeace, only 9% of plastic produced in 2015 was recycled, 12% burnt and 79% ended up in landfill.


"With the spike in the production of plastics and a broken recycling system, the world now generates huge amounts of plastic waste each year. Approximately 6300 Mt of plastic waste have been produced by 2015, of which 9% was recycled, 12% incinerated while the bulk - 79% - ended up in landfills or the natural environment [3]. The amount of plastic waste generated per year is growing and is projected to reach a cumulative amount of 25,000Mt by 2050, compared to 6,300Mt in 2015."


https://www.greenpeace.org/archive-seasia/PageFiles/936685/The%20Recycling%20Myth%20-%20Malaysia%20and%20the%20Broken%20Global%20Recycling%20System.pdf


However, similar figures especially for Malaysia are hard to find, especially the extent to which "no free, single-use plastic bags" and "no free plastic straws" rulings have had on protecting our domestic environment and save our wildlife, so we end up having to rely on worldwide figures or statistics from the developed countries.


Australia treating Malaysia as a garbage bin and a toilet for other countries' waste.


"Exposing Australia's recycling lie | 60 Minutes Australia"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqrlEsPoyJk


So what's the point of subjecting us ordinary consumers to such inconvenience or expense when bigger culprits get away with it?


The Malaysian Reserve article of 9th May 2019 follows below:-





Millions collected for plastic bags end in retailers account?

by AFIQ AZIZ / pic by HUSSEIN SHAHARUDDIN


RETAILERS could pocket millions of ringgit from the 20 sen charged to customers for each plastic bag used as the pollutant charge ends in the businesses' bank accounts instead of funds for "green" efforts.


A few states have implemented the "No Free Plastic Bag" policy to discourage consumers from using the environmentally damaging plastic bags. Customers, who insist on the plastic bags, are charged 20 sen each.


But it is generally believed that the collection from the sale of the less than five sen worth plastic bag would go to authorities or consolidated collection accounts.


Malaysia Retail Chain Association (MRCA) said based on feedback from its members, the levy collected has not been channelled to the government as they are not bound to channel the money to any authorised fund.


"The money doesn't go to the state. If you read their website, retailers are only encouraged to do corporate social responsibility (CSR), otherwise, the retailers retain the funds," MRCA told The Malaysian Reserve (TMR) in a text reply.


The "No Free Plastic Bag" has been somewhat successful as consumers have started to bring their own bags to carry their purchases, which subsequently reduce the number of single-use plastic bags.


Dubbed as pollution charge, the fee on plastic bags has been implemented in Penang, Selangor and Melaka.


Penang is the first state to have implemented the "No Free Plastic Bag" policy almost a decade ago. It started to charge 20 sen for each plastic bag every Saturday since 2009 before extending it to every day in 2011.


Melaka introduced the same policy in 2014 for every Friday, Saturday and Sunday before it was extended to every day from January 2016.


Selangor introduced the policy on Saturday in January 2010 before a mandatory "seven days a week" was implemented in January 2017 and each plastic bag is charged 20 sen.


Presently, the collection involved supermarkets and food outlets with the majority of the collection comes from supermarkets. Selangor is already looking to have a total ban on plastic bags by 2030 in line with the national aspiration.


Kedah has also started to charge consumers 20 sen for every plastic bag since April for purchases conducted every Friday and Saturday.


But there is no policy that requires retailers to channel the plastic bag sales to any authority.


It was reported that around RM2 million was collected in Selangor in the first half of 2017, while businesses in Penang secured about RM9 million of plastic levy since the state pioneered the project in 2009.


Association for the Protection of Natural Heritage of Malaysia (PEKA) Puan Sri Shariffa Sabrina Syed Akil said the promised campaign has not materialised for states that implemented the the plastic bag charge.


"I have never come across of any supermarket or business that pays back the 20 sen to any non-governmental organisation or any charity work. So, the campaign did not materialise. It did not work and has failed," she told TMR.


Shariffa Sabrina said PEKA has queried about the pollution charge but there is no concrete answer. "So, I suppose it goes back to the company," she said.


The Selangor government is mulling to take over the fund manager role with the local government authority (PBT) collecting the money.


Selangor exco for Environment, Green Technology and Consumer Affairs committee chairman Hee Loy Sian said the current collector is not doing their best as no significant campaign awareness has been seen in the last decade.


"We found that some of them are doing the CSR job, but some are not. That is why we want to take over," he told TMR.


Since 2010, supermarkets in Selangor have been "encouraged" to charge the fee which would be used for environmental campaign and programmes including using more recycled bags.


Hee said the role will be taken over by the state before year-end and the money will be parked in a trust fund for environmental awareness campaign and CSR purposes.


Hee said initially, the government planned to impose the rule by July 1 but had to defer the date as it needs to find the best collection mechanism.


"We are studying the system now in which retailers can report directly to the PBT on a monthly basis for each and every plastic bag charge they have collected.


"Once the system is ready, we will implement it," Hee said, citing the Penang government collection mechanism as one of the options.


"But in Penang, there are just two PBTs. We do have 12 in total. So it may be easier for them to manage compared to us," he added.


On March 15, the Federal Territories Ministry has also mandated the "No Free Plastic Bag" for retailers under its jurisdiction.


https://themalaysianreserve.com/2019/05/09/millions-collected-for-plastic-bags-end-in-retailers-account/


Given the above, The above "no free, single-use plastic bags" an "no plastic straws" rulings are as meaningless as token gestures as the unused bicycle stands in the Petaling Jaya New Town Centre in Section 52, Petaling Jaya, which hardly anyone come to by bicycle from other parts of Petaling Jaya, partly due to the hot and humid climate and the risk of getting knocked down on the roads leading to this centre.




However, I suppose this is the Petaling Jaya City Council's (MBPJ's) idea of "making Petaling Jaya into a liveable city" comparable to world class cities in the developed countries where bicycling along the streets during the day is more more practical due to the cooler climate.


I suppose this is a symptom of a cut and paste culture, whilst the MBPJ has approved more building of monstrous high-rises in Petaling Jaya - which will turn our home city into a concrete jungle and a heat island.


This video shows the experience of Singapore where researches measured an increase of 4 degrees C between an outlying area of Singapore and 29.1 degrees C on Orchard Road in central Singapore.


"Why Singapore Is Heating Up 2x Faster Than The Planet | Why It Matters | CNA Insider"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrQ9zjvmD6k


Yours trully


Selangor Scheiss

http://selangorscheiss.blogspot.com/



Saturday 4 May 2019

DOING A "SYRIZA" ON RESIDENTS

"What does doing a Syriza mean?", you ask.

Well, back in July 2015, Greece's "radical left" Syriza government betrayed the Greek people's vote by 61% in a referendum which said "no" to further neo-liberal, globalist austerity measures imposed upon them by the European Union.

However, a week later, the Syriza government yielded to European Union pressure and agreed to accept more austerity measures to be imposed on Greece and her suffering people - doing a 180 degrees U-turn against what Syriza had been voted in for, and 180 degrees opposite what the Greek people had voted for.

On 11 July 2015 the BBC put it very nicely:-

Just over a week ago, Alexis Tsipras stepped on to a podium in Syntagma Square in Athens. In his trademark open-necked white shirt, his sleeves rolled up, he punched the air.

"I call on you to say a big 'no' to ultimatums, 'no' to blackmail," he cried. "Turn your back on those who would terrorise you."

His thousands of fans roared in approval. The Greek public followed his lead and 61% voted "oxi" ("No").

Roll forward seven days and Greece's prime minister signed the very measures he had fought against. Corporate tax and VAT will rise, privatisations will be pursued, public sector pay lowered and early retirement phased out.

In a late-night speech to parliament, a chastened Alexis Tsipras compared negotiations to a war, in which battles are fought and lost.

"It is our national duty to keep our people alive and in the eurozone", he said. There was not a fist-punch in sight.

The old adage of a week being a long time in politics could not be more relevant. But even for us Greece-watchers, the past few days have left us scratching our heads. 

Thus since then, I coined the term "doing a Syriza" to mean  elected leaders of governments which betray the will of the people who had voted for them.

More recently, we have seen the both the Conservative government and opposition Labour parliamentarians join hands to try and do a Syriza upon the British people's referendum choice that the United Kingdom leave the European Union of what's popularly known as "Brexit".

Oh! how people loved how U.K. parliamentary speaker John Bercow said "Or-d-e-e-e-e-e-e-r!"

It's great that the Conservatives and Labour got hammered in the U.K. local elections.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VagWy8t60mg

However, the problem is that the Liberal Democrats (Lib-Dems) are opposed to Brexit.

We believe that Britain is better off in the EU. That's why we're fighting for an Exit from Brexit.

https://www.libdems.org.uk/brexit

Anyway, closer to home, the Pakatan state governments of Penang and Selangor had been doing a Syriza on the people of these states since they were elected to power back in March 2008 and the Syriza show" has continued not only in Penang and Selangor but also under the Pakatanfederal government since 10th May 2018.

You can read Anil Netto's blog posts about the issues they face with the Pakatan Harapan state government of Penang and the "development" which has been allowed up there since Pakatan won Penang in 2008, whilst I focus on issues in Petaling Jaya, Selangor and Kuala Lumpur.


Just yesterday I posted a blog about what Petaling Jaya activist resident Mak Khuin Weng said about how the Pakatan state government of Selangor has been doing a Syriza on us people.

 
In the Free Malaysia Today article of 4 May 2019 below, Derek Fernandez, Petaling Jaya City Councillor for Zon 12 (Section 5 and 10) 2018/2020, critises the Federal Territories Ministry and the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) for continuing to make it difficult for residents of Kuala Lumpur to obtain critical reports and documents, such as the development impact proposal report and the traffic impact assessment report, among others.

Here, Kuala Lumpur members of parliament and Kuala Lumpur residents, such as those of Taman Tiara Titiwangsa, who had gone to court to get a ruling which would require that the relevant authorities make such documents available to the public who needed them, so that they can present their case in a meaningful way under Rule 5 of the Federal Territory Planning Act 1982, which allows public participation in areas of planning and development control.

The court had ruled in the residents' favour but now the Federal Territories Ministry and DBKL have appealed the court's ruling.

Before the 9th May 2018 general elections, the Pakatan Harapan which was then in opposition, condemned the Federal Territories Ministry and the ruling Barisan Nasional government which it came under, for denying public access to such key information and Pakatan had promised to "uphold principles that were 'essential to competency, accountability and transparency' if elected", whatever that political gibberish means.

However now, that Pakatan Harapan had won the Federal Government almost a year ago, and by that control of the Federal Territories Ministry and the DBKL, they have continued to do the same as had been done under Barisan Nasional rule.

Basically, after all their election promises to be a "government for the people" if elected, now that they have been elected, the Pakatan Harapan state government of Selangor and the Pakatan Harapan federal government of Malaysia have been doing several Syrizas on us the people. 

The Free Malaysia Today article referred to follows below:-



Nothing's changed, says expert after DBKL appeals court decision favouring residents
FMT Reporters -
May 4, 2019 2:31 PM

PETALING JAYA: A local government expert has slammed the Federal Territories ministry and City Hall (DBKL) over the latter's decision to appeal a court's decision that would grant Taman Tiara Titiwangsa residents access to important documents.


Derek Fernandez said prior to the May 9 polls, Pakatan Harapan MPs in Kuala Lumpur attacked the Barisan Nasional (BN) and the former FT minister after residents were denied access to critical reports and documents, such as the development impact proposal report and the traffic impact assessment report, among others.


He said this led to KL MPs and many KL residents to claim that they were denied a fair hearing when objecting to development projects.


Fernandez said subsequently, many KL MPs promised residents in the capital that if PH won, they would uphold principles that were "essential to competency, accountability and transparency".


"This is the mantra PH repeatedly chanted when in the opposition, with their war cry of 'Reformasi' and 'Ubah' in governance," he said in a statement.


But DBKL, Fernandez said, is now appealing a decision of the Court of Appeal which held that residents have a right to such documents which were denied to them during the BN administration because of abuses by the previous administration.


"This shows clearly to KL residents that nothing has really changed and it is business as usual as far as the Federal Territories ministry and DBKL is concerned."


On March 13, the Court of Appeal nullified a public objection hearing on a high-density project in Taman Tiara Titiwangsa awarded to Yayasan Wilayah Persekutuan (YWP).


The court accepted the residents' argument that they were unable to present their case in a meaningful way under Rule 5 of the Federal Territory Planning Act 1982, which allows public participation in areas of planning and development control.


The residents said DBKL failed to give a detailed explanation of the project and did not meet their request for disclosure of technical reports such as those related to the project's impact on traffic flow and social well-being.


Federal Territories Minister Khalid Samad has since defended the DBKL decision to take the matter to the Federal Court, saying it was a legal dispute.


"This is not a question of politics. DBKL will still need to follow the legal procedures," he was reported to have said.


https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2019/05/04/nothings-changed-says-expert-after-dbkl-appeals-court-decision-favouring-residents/


C'mon Derek, whack the Selangor state government and the Petaling Jaya City Council publicly as strongly as you have done the Pakatan Harapan controlled Federal Territories Ministry and the DBKL above.


Whack the Petaling Jaya City Council publicly for allowing the continuation of rampant high-rise development in Petaling Jaya which could either lead to lot of unsold or unoccupied properties on the one hand or to massive traffic congestion on the streets if they are occupied.


Whack them publicly for the potholed and uneven roads which we suffering residents of Petaling Jaya have had to endure all these years.


Whack them publicly for our dubious "honour" of having the highest rates of dengue in the country.


Whack them publicly for the high density transit-oriented developments (ToD) projects approved in and around Petaling Jaya and in Selangor.


Whack them for not providing enough recreational parks, green spaces and tree-lined roads for us the Petaling Jaya and Selangor public.


Whack the Selangor state government publicly over the water problems especially those of us on higher ground, such as some residents in Section 14 Petaling Jaya are facing.


Whack the Selangor state government for allowing the Damansara-Shah Alam elevated Highway (DASH) to run through Damansara Perdana and Mutiara Damansara despite residents' repeated demands that DASH should be routed away from their residential and commercial area.


Yours trully


Selangor Scheiss

http://selangorscheiss.blogspot.com/

Friday 3 May 2019

MAK KHUIN WENG BRIEFS SECTION 14 RESIDENTS.

On 30 April 2019 I attended a talk by Petaling Jaya residents rights activist Mak Khuin Weng at the Section 14, Petaling Jaya Residents Association cabin.

Mak Khuin Weng is a former journalist and a former Petaling Jaya City Councillor for three terms and some of what he said is in his Facebook posting below the picture.

Mak also told us that the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) keeps on adding new projects to the Petaling Jaya Masterplan, when once decided upon, these masterplans which have a date should be frozen and not be added to.

Also, whilst the MBPJ gives residents the opportunity to formally file objections to the MBPJ, however it is very difficult for residents to obtain detailed documents related to the proposal, so find it difficult to put forward a credible objection and that is the same case with filing credible objections to the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL), and residents in neighbouring Kuala Lumpur, which is adjacent to Petaling Jaya face the same problem as us.

Thus we residents have to firefight to defend our interests. 

Well, all this under Pakatan Harapan state and federal governments, which we who voted for them had hoped that they would stand by us.

Well it looks like whoever we vote for, the government won and screws us just the same, whether Pakatan Harapan or Barisan Nasional. 



This s what Mak wrote one year ago.

Mak Khuin Weng
17 April 2018 ·

It's April 2018 and Pakatan Harapan still haven't taken a stand on their Transit Oriented Development Policy that was revealed in January due to a proposal to redevelop the A&W PJ.

Just to recap, in January this year, MBPJ approved a plot ratio 8 development on the A&W PJ site using TOD rules. This rule has not been formally adopted yet and the existing limitations is a plot ratio of 4.

Although the DAP ADUNs and Councillors staged a dramatic walkout of the MBPJ full board meeting in protest of the development, they still said that TOD rules are valid, although they have not explained when or how MBPJ adopted the TOD rules.

If you want the specifics, there will be links to my previous posts at the bottom.

Today's post is actually about how MBPJ cheated all of us back in 2012 even before they had a formal consideration of the TOD rules to increase development plot ratio from 4, and that evidence comes from the One-Way Loop Interim Report.

According to the report, one of the many justifications for the One-Way Loop was to make traffic smoother for development projects that had been approved in 2012. I have attached Pages 12, 13 and 14 for you to read.

Out of those 'committed projects' that necessitated the One-Way Loop, two of the projects had a plot ratio of 6. Both were projects near the Asia Jaya LRT Station. This was the precursor to the TOD Rules that they didn't even bother telling anyone about. They just quietly did it and then used the approved development projects to justify the One-Way Loop project.

I presented this at the RTPJ1 Hearing in July 2015 when MBPJ wanted to amend the local plan. Of course, my arguments were ignored, even though there was a blatant disregard by MBPJ when it came to enforcing their own rules.

This is one of the many reasons why I'm supporting a BN candidate now.

Mr Tan Gim Tuan actually spoke up against this sort of nonsense too: https://www.thestar.com.my/…/review-decision-on-much-talke…/

You can read more about how MBPJ screwed us over with the TOD rules in these previous posts:




You can go through the slide presentation which I uploaded three years ago here: https://www.scribd.com/…/2714234…/RTPJ1-Hearing-13-July-2015


Yours trully

Selangor Scheiss

Thursday 2 May 2019

HOPEFULLY WE WILL SEE SOME PROPERTY DEVELOPERS GO BANKRUPT WITH THE PROPERTY GLUT

In my previous post - HIGH-RISE MONSTROSITIES, MORE QUIT RENT REVENUE FOR SELANGOR?  I criticised the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) and the Pakatan state government of Selangor of 11 years now for allowing rampant building of high-rise monstrosities which could lead result in massive traffic congestion.


Furthermore, the additional number of residents occupying these condos and landed properties could well lead to an overload of our water and electricity supply networks.

Well the good news is that many of these new properties will be unlikely to be sold due to weak demand, whilst property developers are facing financial difficulties and a few bankruptcies amongst them will serve them right.

Following below is an article by Thean Lee Cheng, a former colleague at The Star and a former Section 14, Petaling Jaya resident. 

Payment woes for contractors

Monday, 22 Apr 2019

by thean lee cheng

PETALING JAYA: The weak property market in recent years has resulted in a competitive tendering environment for building construction jobs, with some contractors willing to cut prices in their efforts to secure new jobs, said Master Builders Association Malaysia (MBAM) president Foo Chek Lee.

"It is a very competitive tendering environment now. For some tenders, we see more than 100 contractors bidding and it impacts all levels of contractors.

"Even big contractors are feeling the pinch and are tendering for jobs in lower-volume brackets just to tide over the challenging business environment," Foo said in an email response to comments from building construction sources that contractors are willing to accept a small loss in order to secure job contracts.

Last month, engineering and construction company Zelan Bhd filed a statement with Bursa Malaysia initiating arbitration proceedings against NRY Architects for RM305.4mil and other contract breaches for the construction of buildings of International Islamic University Malaysia in Kuantan.

A second Zelan statement to Bursa claimed RM3.34mil in outstanding payment for construction works from BBCC Development Sdn Bhd.

BBCC Development is the project owner of the multi-billion-ringgit Bukit Bintang City Centre, a joint venture between Eco World Development Group Bhd , UDA Holdings Bhd and the Employees Provident Fund.

Eco World disputed the claim.


An industry source said one construction company does not sour the entire sector, but three other sources said building contractors are feeling the strain of the weak property market.A source said he personally knows of one which closed down a few years ago when the property market began to weaken in 2014.

Another source said contractors would have to continue to play the game because of equipment purchased during the good times.

This second industry source said: "Previously, they could make more money and now they have to cut down their profits. They have their overheads and margins. They cannot retract too much because when the job comes back, there are not enough workers. We don't know where the economy is going."

MBAM's Foo said the key is "to tender the price fairly". Foo is also executive director of construction and civil engineers Mitrajaya Holdings Bhd .

"If a contractor prices too low, he may have problems delivering the project at the end of the day," Foo said.


The weak property market has resulted in an oversupply of residential units which lack demand on two counts – they are located in places which lack demand because the surroundings lack facilities and infrastructure, or they are priced out of reach of the ordinary folk.

The weak demand has resulted in developers putting the launch of new units on hold, or delaying their launches, impacting the building construction industry.


The construction industry is generally divided between building construction and infrastructure. The infrastructure boys, according to industry sources, seem to be faring better.Foo said most contractors would have experienced delays and non-payment problems. He hopes contra arrangements, giving properties in exchange for payment, are not very high."Contractors should be paid for work done – and not be paid in kind – to ease their cash flow," he said.


He said that as long as there are contractual arrangements and freedom between parties, contractors will continue to face payment issues.


"These issues (late or delayed payment or contra arrangements) not only happen in the property development or the construction industry, but also in other industries.


"This is part of the 'occupational hazard' and risk of the industry if you are unlucky to have a 'slow payment' or 'non-payment' client," he said.


Foo said MBAM has heard about such incidents "for quite some time".


"Sometimes, due to the prevailing market situation, contractors may have no choice but to accept payment in the form of properties and hopefully be able to dispose of them later and recover some of their money/payments. Sometimes, it might be due to contractual disputes," he said.He said this situation of delays or payment in kind has come about due to cash-flow problems and other contractual-related reasons.


https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2019/04/22/payment-woes-for-contractors/


This next article in The Star by Thean Lee Cheng reveals the weaknesses of the neo-liberal policy towards public housing inherited from the previous Barisan Nasional government and continued by the Pakatan Harapan government.

 

PR1MA public housing may be dissolve

Thursday, 2 May 2019

11:59 AM MYT

 

KUALA LUMPUR: Perbadanan PR1MA Malaysia may be dissolved pending due diligence and a turnaround plan, its chairman Tan Sri Eddy Chen said.

He said on Thursday: "We found it very challenging because of the business model is numbers driven. It was given a big number to build and very little land to work on".

PR1MA was established under the PR1MA Act 2012 to plan, develop, construct and maintain high-quality housing with lifestyle concepts for middle-income households in key urban centres.

Its objective was that the housing units would be priced between RM100,000 to RM400,000.

The housing units were to be built in key strategic urban areas nationwide, PR1MA was open to all Malaysians with a monthly household income between RM2,500 to RM15,000.