Thursday 9 May 2019

A MERE TOKEN GESTURES TO "PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT" AND "SAVE WILDLIFE"

I'd really like to know by how much as these "No free single-use plastic bag" and "no plastic straws" rulings have actually achieved to protect the environment and save wildlife in Malaysia, when almost everything else we buy comes packed or wrapped in plastic, to the extent that my dedicated garbage bin for plastic to be recycled ("hopefully" ) fills up faster than my bin for other refuse.




This "no free single-use plastic bags" ruling began with no free single-use plastic bags on Saturdays in Penang shortly after the Pakatan Harapan won the state government in 2008 and it was introduced by the Pakatan run Selangor state government in 2010 and in 2017, the ruling was extended to include all days of the week.


The Federal Territories Ministry, under the Pakatan Harapan government since 10th May 2018, also mandated "no free, single-use plastic bags" within Malaysia's federal territories such as Kuala Lumpur and Labuan from March 2019.


The other day, I went for a root beer in one of those chain outlets which had a sign saying that they had stopped giving out plastic straws but they had put a plastic spoon in the glass of root beer, which made this campaign a big joke.


In many ways, I feel that these rulings are mere token gestures to look "good" and "environmentally responsible" whilst they are a proverbial drop in the bucket in terms of reducing plastic waste, when almost everything else we buy comes packed or wrapped in plastic and container loads of plastic waste are being illegally imported into Malaysia, with non-recyclable plastics being falsely declared as "recyclable".


"Checks show dirty plastic still being smuggled into Malaysian ports"

https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2019/04/482312/checks-show-dirty-plastic-still-being-smuggled-malaysian-ports


Also, most plastics cannot be recycled.


According to environmental advocacy group Greenpeace, only 9% of plastic produced in 2015 was recycled, 12% burnt and 79% ended up in landfill.


"With the spike in the production of plastics and a broken recycling system, the world now generates huge amounts of plastic waste each year. Approximately 6300 Mt of plastic waste have been produced by 2015, of which 9% was recycled, 12% incinerated while the bulk - 79% - ended up in landfills or the natural environment [3]. The amount of plastic waste generated per year is growing and is projected to reach a cumulative amount of 25,000Mt by 2050, compared to 6,300Mt in 2015."


https://www.greenpeace.org/archive-seasia/PageFiles/936685/The%20Recycling%20Myth%20-%20Malaysia%20and%20the%20Broken%20Global%20Recycling%20System.pdf


However, similar figures especially for Malaysia are hard to find, especially the extent to which "no free, single-use plastic bags" and "no free plastic straws" rulings have had on protecting our domestic environment and save our wildlife, so we end up having to rely on worldwide figures or statistics from the developed countries.


Australia treating Malaysia as a garbage bin and a toilet for other countries' waste.


"Exposing Australia's recycling lie | 60 Minutes Australia"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqrlEsPoyJk


So what's the point of subjecting us ordinary consumers to such inconvenience or expense when bigger culprits get away with it?


The Malaysian Reserve article of 9th May 2019 follows below:-





Millions collected for plastic bags end in retailers account?

by AFIQ AZIZ / pic by HUSSEIN SHAHARUDDIN


RETAILERS could pocket millions of ringgit from the 20 sen charged to customers for each plastic bag used as the pollutant charge ends in the businesses' bank accounts instead of funds for "green" efforts.


A few states have implemented the "No Free Plastic Bag" policy to discourage consumers from using the environmentally damaging plastic bags. Customers, who insist on the plastic bags, are charged 20 sen each.


But it is generally believed that the collection from the sale of the less than five sen worth plastic bag would go to authorities or consolidated collection accounts.


Malaysia Retail Chain Association (MRCA) said based on feedback from its members, the levy collected has not been channelled to the government as they are not bound to channel the money to any authorised fund.


"The money doesn't go to the state. If you read their website, retailers are only encouraged to do corporate social responsibility (CSR), otherwise, the retailers retain the funds," MRCA told The Malaysian Reserve (TMR) in a text reply.


The "No Free Plastic Bag" has been somewhat successful as consumers have started to bring their own bags to carry their purchases, which subsequently reduce the number of single-use plastic bags.


Dubbed as pollution charge, the fee on plastic bags has been implemented in Penang, Selangor and Melaka.


Penang is the first state to have implemented the "No Free Plastic Bag" policy almost a decade ago. It started to charge 20 sen for each plastic bag every Saturday since 2009 before extending it to every day in 2011.


Melaka introduced the same policy in 2014 for every Friday, Saturday and Sunday before it was extended to every day from January 2016.


Selangor introduced the policy on Saturday in January 2010 before a mandatory "seven days a week" was implemented in January 2017 and each plastic bag is charged 20 sen.


Presently, the collection involved supermarkets and food outlets with the majority of the collection comes from supermarkets. Selangor is already looking to have a total ban on plastic bags by 2030 in line with the national aspiration.


Kedah has also started to charge consumers 20 sen for every plastic bag since April for purchases conducted every Friday and Saturday.


But there is no policy that requires retailers to channel the plastic bag sales to any authority.


It was reported that around RM2 million was collected in Selangor in the first half of 2017, while businesses in Penang secured about RM9 million of plastic levy since the state pioneered the project in 2009.


Association for the Protection of Natural Heritage of Malaysia (PEKA) Puan Sri Shariffa Sabrina Syed Akil said the promised campaign has not materialised for states that implemented the the plastic bag charge.


"I have never come across of any supermarket or business that pays back the 20 sen to any non-governmental organisation or any charity work. So, the campaign did not materialise. It did not work and has failed," she told TMR.


Shariffa Sabrina said PEKA has queried about the pollution charge but there is no concrete answer. "So, I suppose it goes back to the company," she said.


The Selangor government is mulling to take over the fund manager role with the local government authority (PBT) collecting the money.


Selangor exco for Environment, Green Technology and Consumer Affairs committee chairman Hee Loy Sian said the current collector is not doing their best as no significant campaign awareness has been seen in the last decade.


"We found that some of them are doing the CSR job, but some are not. That is why we want to take over," he told TMR.


Since 2010, supermarkets in Selangor have been "encouraged" to charge the fee which would be used for environmental campaign and programmes including using more recycled bags.


Hee said the role will be taken over by the state before year-end and the money will be parked in a trust fund for environmental awareness campaign and CSR purposes.


Hee said initially, the government planned to impose the rule by July 1 but had to defer the date as it needs to find the best collection mechanism.


"We are studying the system now in which retailers can report directly to the PBT on a monthly basis for each and every plastic bag charge they have collected.


"Once the system is ready, we will implement it," Hee said, citing the Penang government collection mechanism as one of the options.


"But in Penang, there are just two PBTs. We do have 12 in total. So it may be easier for them to manage compared to us," he added.


On March 15, the Federal Territories Ministry has also mandated the "No Free Plastic Bag" for retailers under its jurisdiction.


https://themalaysianreserve.com/2019/05/09/millions-collected-for-plastic-bags-end-in-retailers-account/


Given the above, The above "no free, single-use plastic bags" an "no plastic straws" rulings are as meaningless as token gestures as the unused bicycle stands in the Petaling Jaya New Town Centre in Section 52, Petaling Jaya, which hardly anyone come to by bicycle from other parts of Petaling Jaya, partly due to the hot and humid climate and the risk of getting knocked down on the roads leading to this centre.




However, I suppose this is the Petaling Jaya City Council's (MBPJ's) idea of "making Petaling Jaya into a liveable city" comparable to world class cities in the developed countries where bicycling along the streets during the day is more more practical due to the cooler climate.


I suppose this is a symptom of a cut and paste culture, whilst the MBPJ has approved more building of monstrous high-rises in Petaling Jaya - which will turn our home city into a concrete jungle and a heat island.


This video shows the experience of Singapore where researches measured an increase of 4 degrees C between an outlying area of Singapore and 29.1 degrees C on Orchard Road in central Singapore.


"Why Singapore Is Heating Up 2x Faster Than The Planet | Why It Matters | CNA Insider"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrQ9zjvmD6k


Yours trully


Selangor Scheiss

http://selangorscheiss.blogspot.com/



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.